A treatise on the loop as a desired form: visual feedback & relational new media
This is my Master’s Thesis.
-
Abstract:
The visual feedback loop has long-been ignored as a form and an aesthetic within new media. Media theories have largely assumed a medium is defined by the material technology, relegating visual feedback to a circumstance of media rather than a unique and well-defined concept. This thesis sets forth a criteria for characterizing the visual feedback loop as a desired form, that is, a distinct set of formal and phenomenological qualities that are independent of a medium. Grounding the criteria are the cinema theories of Gilles Deleuze and Sean Cubitt; these theories propose that the cinematic image relates visual forms to generate information in decoding rather represents information directly. The thesis elaborates the theoretical concepts in examples of visual feedback loops from video (Nam June Paik’s TV Buddha, Bruce Nauman’s Live Taped Video Corridor), new media art (Daniel Rozin’s physical mirrors), and digital technologies (GPS navigation systems). To reconcile the visual feedback loop within media theories, the thesis calls for a radical change in how theorists define a medium. Moving away from notions of inscription and materiality, media now rely on a collapsed distinction between sender and receiver. Hence, visual feedback loops exist as remediations of a conceptual framework rather than a technological one, and so require a logic within media theory that allow for the rise of other desired forms like the visual feedback loop.
—
Bibliography:
“Bruce Nauman, Live-Taped Video Corridor.” ZKM Center for Art and Media, http://www.medienkunstnetz.de/works/live-taped-video-corridor/.
Arnheim, Rudolph. “Pictures, Symbols, and Signs.” In Visual Rhetoric in a Digital World: A Critical Sourcebook, edited by Carolyn Handa, 137-51. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2004.
Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulation. Translated by Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1994.
Bergson, Henri. Duration and Simultineity. Translated by Leon Jacobson. New York: Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1965.
Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1999.
Bordwell, David, and Kristen Thompson. Film Art: An Introduction. Seventh ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2004.
Bourriaud, Nicolas. “Relational Aesthetics.” In Participation, edited by Calire Bishop, 160-71. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2006.
Brakhage, Stan. Essential Brakhage: Selected Writings on Filmmaking. New York: McPherson & Company, 2001.
Cubitt, Sean. The Cinema Effect. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2004.
Curry, Michael R. Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies. New York: Routledge, 1998.
De Angelus, Michele. “Interview with Bruce Nauman.” In Please Pay Attention: Bruce Nauman’s Words, edited by Bruce Nauman and Jane Kraynak, 197-295. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2003.
Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
———. Negotiations, 1972-1990. Translated by Martin Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
———. “Postscript on Control Societies.” In Ctrl [Space]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother, edited by Thomas Y. Levin, Ursula Frohne and Peter Weibel, 316-21. Karlsruhe: ZKM Center for Art and Media, 2002.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Rosalind Krauss. “Plato and the Simulacrum.” October 27, no. Winter (1983): 45-56.
Handa, Carolyn, ed. Visual Rhetoric in a Digital World: A Critical Sourcebook. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2004.
Hanhardt, John G. The Worlds of Nam June Paik. New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications, 2000.
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Huizinga, Johan. “Nature and Significance of Play as a Cultural Phenomenon.” In The Game Design Reader: A Rules of Play Anthology, edited by Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman, 96-120. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2006.
Joselit, David. “No Exit: Video and the Readymade.” October 119, no. Winter (2007): 37-45.
Katti, Christian. “”Systematically” Observing Surveillence: Paradoxes of Observation According to Niklas Luhmann’s Systems Theory.” In Ctrl [Space]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother, edited by Thomas Y. Levin, Ursula Frohne and Peter Weibel, 50-63. Karlsruhe: ZKM Center for Art and Media, 2002.
Krauss, Rosalind. “Video: The Aesthetics of Narcissism.” October 1, no. Spring (1976): 50-64.
Lee, Hyun-Jean. “The Screen as Boundary Object in the Realm of Imagination.” Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009.
Levin, Thomas Y., Ursula Frohne, and Peter Weibel, eds. Ctrl [Space]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Karlsruhe: ZKM Center for Art and Media, 2002.
Manovich, Lev. The Language of New Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2001.
———. “Information as an Aesthetic Event.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007.
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: The New American Library, 1964.
Meigh-Andrews, Chris. A History of Video Art: The Development of Form and Function. New York: Berg Publishers, 2006.
Metz, Christian. Film Language: A Semiotics of Cinema. Translated by Michael Taylor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1974. Reprint, 1991.
Pickles, John. “Representation in an Electronic Age: Geography, Gis, and Democracy.” In Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Informations Systems, edited by John Pickles. New York: The Guilford Press, 1995.
Prince, Gerald. A Dictionary of Narratology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2003.
Rees, A.L. A History of Experimental Film and Video. London: British Film Institute Publishing, 1999.
Restivo, Angelo. “Into the Breach: Between the Movement-Image and the Time-Image.” In The Brain Is the Screen: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Cinema, edited by Gregory Flaxman, 171-93. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
Roberts, Susan M., and Richard H. Schein. “Earth Shattering: Global Imagery and Gis.” In Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Informations Systems, edited by John Pickles, 171-95. New York: The Guilford Press, 1995.
Ross, David. “A Conversation with Nam June Paik.” In Nam June Paik: Video Time–Video Space, edited by Toni Stooss and Thomas Kellein, 56-65. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., 1993.
Rush, Michael. New Media in Late 20th-Century Art. New York: Thames & Hudson Inc., 1999.
Schimmel, Paul. “Pay Attention.” In Bruce Nauman, edited by Joan Simon, 68-82. Minneapolis: Distributed Art Publishers, 1994.
Schwab, Martin. “Escape from the Image: Deleuze’s Image-Ontology.” In The Brain Is the Screen: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Cinema, edited by Gregory Flaxman, 109-39. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
Sobchack, Vivian. The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton: The Princeton University Press, 1992.
Vesna, Victoria, ed. Database Aesthetics: Art in the Age of Information Overflow. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.
Wade, Tasha, and Shelly Sommer, eds. A to Z Gis: An Illustrated Dictionary of Geographic Information Systems. Redlands: ESRI Press, 2006.
Weibel, Peter. “Pleasure and the Panoptic Principle.” In Ctrl [Space]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother, edited by Thomas Y. Levin, Ursula Frohne and Peter Weibel, 206-23. Karlsruhe: ZKM Center for Art and Media, 2002.
Weinbren, Grahame. “Ocean, Database, Recut.” In Database Aesthetics: Art in the Age of Information Overflow, edited by Victoria Vesna, 61-85. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.
Zbikowski, Dörte. “Bruce Nauman.” In Ctrl [Space]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother, edited by Thomas Y. Levin, Ursula Frohne and Peter Weibel, 64-67. Karlsruhe: ZKM Center for Art and Media, 2002.